Niken Ayu (1), Edi Supratman (2)
The rapid development of information technology has encouraged military organizations, including Jasdam II Sriwijaya, to adopt digital applications in order improve administrative efficiency and service quality. One of the innovations implemented is the SI Jempol application, which is designed to facilitate personnel administr ative services. This study aims to analyze the quality of the SI Jempol application using the usability testing method to evaluate its ease of use, effectiveness, and user satisfaction. Data were collected through a questionnaire based on the System Usability Scale (SUS), distributed to a group of application users. The analysis was carried out by calculating the SUS score and identifying both the strengths and weaknesses of the application. The findings indicate that SI Jempol achieved an average usability score categorized as [e.g., “good” or “fairly satisfactory” – to be adjusted according to results], suggesting that the application is effective and acceptable to users. However, several aspects still require improvement, such as. In conclusion, the SI Jempol application has strong potential to be further developed as a digital service that supports administrative performance within Jasdam II Sriwijaya.
Anastasya, L. (2020). ANALISIS PENINGKATAN KUALITAS APLIKASI POSPAY PT. POS INDONESIA DENGAN METODE MC CALL (Doctoral dissertation, Universitas Pembangunan Nasional Veteran Jakarta).
Arman, A., Efendy, Z., Candra, J. E., & Karnady, V. (2021). ANALISIS APLIKASI E- LEARNING STMIK INDONESIA PADANG SEBAGAI MEDIA PEMBELAJARAN JARAK JAUH DI MASA PENDEMI COVID-19 DENGAN METODE USABILITY. Rang Teknik Journal, 4(1), 134-142.
Brooke, J. (1996). SUS: A QUICK AND DIRTY USABILITY SCALE. In P. W. Jordan, B. Thomas, B. A. Weerdmeester, & I. L. McClelland (Eds.), Usability evaluation in industry (pp. 189–194). London: Taylor & Francis.
Nielsen, J. (1993). USABILITY ENGINEERING. Boston, MA: Academic Press.
ISO 9241-210:2019. (2019). ERGONOMICS OF HUMAN-SYSTEM INTERACTIOn — Part 210: Human-centred design for interactive systems. International Organization for Standardization.
Sauro, J., & Lewis, J. R. (2016). QUANTIFYING THE USER EXPERIENCE: PRACTICAL STATISTICS FOR USER RESEARCH (2nd ed.). Burlington, MA: Morgan Kaufmann.
Rubin, J., & Chisnell, D. (2008). HANDBOOK OF USABILITY TESTING: HOW TO PLAN, DESIGN, AND CONDUCT EFFECTIVE TESTS (2nd ed.). Indianapolis, IN: Wiley.
Hertzum, M. (2020). USABILITY TESTING: TOO EARLY? TOO LITTLE? TOO ARTIFICIAL? Journal of Usability Studies, 15(3), 94–100.
Zaharias, P., & Poylymenakou, A. (2009). DEVELOPING A USABILITY EVALUATION METHOD FOR E-LEARNING APPLICATIONS: BEYOND FUNCTIONAL USABILITY. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 25(1), 75–98. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447310802546716
Putra, A. E., & Falahah. (2019). ANALISIS KUALITAS APLIKASI MOBILE MENGGUNAKAN METODE USABILITY TESTING. Jurnal Teknologi Informasi dan Ilmu Komputer (JTIIK), 6(1), 45–52. https://doi.org/10.25126/jtiik.201961234
Hartson, R., & Pyla, P. S. (2012). THE UX BOOK: PROCESS AND GUIDELINES FOR ENSURING A QUALITY USER EXPERIENCE. Burlington, MA: Morgan Kaufmann.
Yuliana, T., Arthana, I. K. R., & Agustini, K. (2019). USABILITY TESTING PADA APLIKASI POTWIS. JST (Jurnal Sains dan Teknologi),8 (1), 12-22.
Zaphiris, P., & Ang, C. S. (2009). HUMAN COMPUTER INTERACTION: CONCEPTS, METHODOLOGIES, TOOLS, AND APPLICATIONS. Hershey, PA: IGI Global.